Beyond Simulation: Real-World Thermal Data from Our Rammed Earth Guesthouse

Coolearth recently had the opportunity to see the guesthouse of our Cherry Valley Rammed Earth project in Prince Edward County independently studied and published in Frontiers in Built Environment (Harvey & Szentesi-Nejur, 2025). Titled “Field-based thermal performance analysis of a cement-stabilized, core-insulated rammed earth house in a cold climate,” the paper by Gabriel Harvey and Szende Szentesi-Nejur is valuable because it moves beyond modelling and theory: it documents how an insulated rammed earth envelope behaves under real winter conditions using multiple field-measurement methods in a cold climate.

Rammed earth is increasingly promoted for its low embodied energy, non-toxic material profile, durability, and its “thermal mass” ability to store and release heat slowly. But the paper notes a key gap: rigorous cold-climate field validation is rare, and simulations can overestimate performance compared to measured reality. In cold regions, moisture and freeze–thaw concerns further increase the need for real-world data.

Project context: Cherry Valley Rammed Earth Home + guesthouse

The guesthouse is part of a residential home designed by Coolearth in Prince Edward County, Ontario. The overall design draws on the client’s goals of minimalism, beauty, and high performance, and on the timeless presence of monolithic masonry and earthen structures. Stabilized rammed earth in variegated light cream tones gives the building its solid, enduring character, while abundant daylight—through carefully placed glazing—keeps the interiors bright and calm. The main house and guesthouse are separated by a covered breezeway/carport and a three-season screened porch, creating a sheltered transition space.

The building envelope is a core-insulated rammed earth wall system: a thick assembly with a 152 mm rigid foam insulation layer sandwiched between inner and outer rammed earth layers. This core-insulation approach is common in North America because it preserves exposed rammed earth on both the interior and exterior.

What the researchers studied and how

The case study monitored the guesthouse during the winter under “free-running” (unheated) conditions over three days (March 16–18, 2025). The methodology combined three complementary approaches:

  • Infrared thermography (IRT): repeated scans of interior and exterior wall surfaces throughout each day to map surface temperatures and identify anomalies.
  • Surface heat-flux sensing: sensors on interior and exterior faces to measure directional heat flow through the walls.
  • Temperature and humidity monitoring: indoor/outdoor logging to assess thermal and moisture stability.

Key findings: stable interiors, strong solar response, and thermal lag

Across the monitoring period, the guesthouse demonstrated a clear thermal-mass signature. Exterior wall surfaces — especially on the south façade –showed strong responsiveness to solar exposure, with the sunniest day producing the highest exterior surface temperatures and a slow evening cooldown. In contrast, interior wall surface temperatures stayed comparatively steady, indicating that the core insulation effectively decoupled indoor surfaces from outdoor swings.

Heat-flux results supported the same story: exterior fluxes varied more dramatically with weather and sun, while interior heat flux remained low and stable, suggesting limited short-term heat transfer into or out of the occupied space. Indoor air conditions were similarly consistent during the unheated period: interior temperatures remained within a tight comfort band while outdoor conditions fluctuated from below freezing to mild daytime peaks. Indoor relative humidity also stayed stable (mid-range comfort levels) despite major exterior humidity variation associated with snowmelt and changing weather—evidence of meaningful hygrothermal buffering, even with cement stabilization.

Thermography did reveal localized thermal bridges at typical junctions (floor-to-wall transitions and around openings). These were limited in area and did not appear to undermine overall stability during the short study, but they point to the value of careful detailing as performance expectations rise.

Takeaway for Coolearth’s work

While the monitoring window was short, the paper provides rare, high-resolution field evidence that a core-insulated, stabilized rammed earth guesthouse in a cold Ontario climate can maintain notably stable indoor temperature and humidity under passive operation, while still benefiting from solar-driven thermal mass behavior.

Reference: Harvey, G., & Szentesi-Nejur, S. (2025). Field-based thermal performance analysis of a cement-stabilized, core-insulated rammed earth house in a cold climate. Frontiers in Built Environment, 11:1695449. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2025.1695449

Understanding Green Building Certifications in Practice

Energy-efficient, durable, and climate-responsive buildings are increasingly shaping how we design and evaluate the built environment. Rising energy costs, evolving municipal standards, and growing awareness of operational carbon have shifted high-performance design from a niche specialty toward a broader professional expectation.

Several popular certification systems help structure this work. Each has a different emphasis — some focus on carbon, others on holistic sustainability, others on energy use, others on building physics and measured performance. Understanding these distinctions is essential.

This post outlines several leading standards in Canada and highlights projects by Coolearth Architecture that have achieved — or are actively pursuing — these certifications.

Canada Green Building Council (CAGBC)

Founded in 2002, the Canada Green Building Council advances sustainable building through advocacy, research, and third-party certification programs. Among its best-known green building certifications are Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) and the Zero Carbon Building (ZCB) Standard.

CAGBC has helped formalize sustainability metrics in Canada, moving conversations beyond good intentions toward measurable outcomes.

Zero Carbon Building (ZCB) Standards:

Buildings are a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions. The ZCB Standard was developed to directly address operational carbon and embodied emissions in buildings.

According to CAGBC:

“A zero-carbon building is highly energy-efficient and minimizes greenhouse gas emissions from building materials and operations. Until all emissions can be eliminated, high-quality carbon offsets can be used as a counterbalance.”

To accommodate different building types and stages of a project, ZCB offers two certification pathways:

  • Performance Standard – Focused on the operational carbon performance of existing buildings.
  • Design Standard – Applied to new construction and major retrofits to ensure zero-carbon outcomes from the outset.

Coolearth has completed projects that have achieved ZCB Certification, including:

  • St. Catharines Fire Station
  • Mount Dennis Early Learning & Childcare Centre

These projects required coordination between envelope performance, mechanical systems, and operational planning to meet carbon performance targets.

Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)

Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) is one of the most internationally recognized green building certification systems.

LEED evaluates projects across multiple categories, including:

  • Energy performance
  • Water efficiency
  • Materials and resources
  • Indoor environmental quality
  • Site and transportation

Points are accumulated across these categories to determine certification levels: Certified, Silver, Gold, or Platinum.

Coolearth Architecture received LEED Silver Certification for the Parry Sound District Social Services Administration Board (DSSAB) renovation and addition — a 19,000 sq ft project housing 50 full-time staff. At the time (2010) relatively few firms in the region were prioritizing high-performance standards, and the project represented a strong commitment by both the client and design team to sustainable building practices.

Toronto Green Standard (TGS)

The City of Toronto developed the Toronto Green Standard (TGS) to guide sustainable development within the city. TGS integrates environmental performance directly into the municipal planning and approvals process.

The framework is organized into tiers:

  • Tier 1 – Mandatory baseline requirements
  • Tiers 2–4 – Voluntary, progressively higher performance levels

TGS addresses:

  • Energy efficiency and greenhouse gas reduction
  • Air quality
  • Climate resilience
  • Water conservation
  • Urban ecology
  • Solid waste management

The Mount Dennis Early Learning & Childcare Centre achieved TGS Version 3 Tier 1, with a post-construction evaluation targeting Tier 3.

Municipal standards such as TGS play an important role in raising the baseline performance of everyday development.

Passive House

The Passive House Institute certification system focuses primarily on reducing heating and cooling demand through envelope performance and building physics, but it also includes measures to quantify renewable energies and cost-benefit-analyses.

Passive House design aims to create buildings that require very little energy to maintain comfortable interior conditions. The approach emphasizes:

  1. High-performance windows – Triple-glazed in cold climates; double-glazed in warm climates.
  2. Thermal insulation – Continuous insulation to retain heat in winter and limit heat gain in summer.
  3. Airtightness – A continuous air barrier verified through blower door testing to prevent uncontrolled air leakage.
  4. Minimized thermal bridges – Careful detailing to eliminate weak points in the building envelope.
  5. Balanced ventilation with heat recovery – Continuous fresh air supply with minimal energy loss.

One critique sometimes directed at certain green certifications is that they verify projected performance at the design stage without long-term operational accountability. Passive House addresses part of this concern by requiring rigorous energy modelling and on-site performance testing, including airtightness verification, and constructoin documentation. Any Passive House Certified building has been reviewed by third parties to ensure compliance with the standard.

Passive House Certification Types

The Passive House Institute offers multiple certification pathways:

Passive House Building Certification Criteria
  • Passive House Classic – Full certification for new buildings meeting strict performance targets.
  • EnerPHit – Retrofit-focused certification recognizing the constraints of existing buildings, particularly unavoidable thermal bridges. See Why Consider EnerPHit Retrofit for your next Home? for more information.
  • Low Energy Building – For projects that do not meet full Passive House thresholds but achieve substantial energy performance improvements.

Coolearth projects include:

  • Multiple Multi-Unit Residential Buildings – Passive House Building Certifications are being targeted for multiple MURB buildings in Ontario. Stay tuned for updates as these become public!
  • Sammon House – EnerPHit Certification (2022), recognized as Toronto’s first certified Passive House retrofit

These projects demonstrate how high-performance standards can be applied to both new construction and complex retrofit conditions.

Summary

Green building certifications are structured frameworks that help align design intent with measurable environmental outcomes. Each standard emphasizes different aspects of performance — carbon, energy demand, materials, or holistic sustainability — but all aim to improve building quality, durability, and environmental responsibility.

At Coolearth, certifications are not pursued as marketing labels but as tools that strengthen design decisions and accountability. From fire stations and childcare centres to residential retrofits, these standards help guide projects toward long-term resilience and occupant well-being.

The goal is not the plaque. The goal is performance.

Planning Delay Invoice Generator

Across Ontario, the average Site Plan Approval now takes 23 months (Source: OAA Report, 2024). For affordable and community projects, those months aren’t theoretical. They translate into lost financing, missed grant applications, missed construction seasons, and higher rents.

That’s why we built the Planning Delay – Invoice Generator, a web app that lets anyone calculate the financial impact of approval delays to send to their Municipality as a “quote”.

It’s satire, yes — of course you can’t actually bill your municipality for delay — but the numbers are real, and the truth they reveal is plain: every month of delay adds up. These costs are tangible, and ultimately borne by clients, communities, and the public itself.

This is not a matter of a single municipality. It is cultural. As noted at the start of this post, according to the Ontario Association of Architects (2024), the average Site Plan Approval process now takes 23 months. The statutory timeline is 60 days. That limit is not occasionally exceeded. It is universally ignored.

The gap between 60 days and 23 months is not administrative nuance. For affordable and community-oriented projects, those months are not theoretical. They mean lost financing windows, missed grants, missed construction seasons, rising interest rates, escalating material costs, internal team turnover, and in some cases, complete project destabilization. Delay is not neutral. Delay reshapes viability. Delay determines what gets built and what does not. And yet: delay has no consequence for the reviewing authority.

Every additional month in review adds interest costs, consultant fees, inflation exposure, and opportunity cost. These are not absorbed by municipalities. They are borne by clients, future residents, and the broader public. Over time, this invisible infrastructure of delay becomes an economic drag on the province itself.

That is why we created the Planning Delay – Invoice Generator, a simple, satirical web tool that calculates the financial cost of approval delays and formats it as a mock “invoice” to send to a municipality — we want to surface these hidden costs.

Coolearth Featured in The Globe and Mail: Mount Dennis Child-Care Centre

We’re proud to share that Coolearth Architecture was recently featured in The Globe and Mail as part of Dave LeBlanc’s Architourist column Baking cookies in Toronto’s first net-zero child-care centre (Sept. 17, 2025).

The story highlights the new Mount Dennis Early Learning and Child Care Centre, designed by CS&P Architects in association with Coolearth Architecture. This is the City of Toronto’s first net-zero child-care centre, a landmark project that brings together high-performance sustainability with a warm, child-friendly design.

Project Highlights

  • Net-Zero Design: 100 kW rooftop solar array, high performance envelope, battery storage, and geothermal systems provide clean energy and ensure resilience during outages.
  • Passive House Principles: Orientation, overhangs, and 16-inch insulated walls reduce energy use while maintaining comfort.
  • Healthy Materials: CLT (cross-laminated timber), glulam beams, and warm wood finishes create a natural, calming atmosphere.
  • Community Focus: A demonstration kitchen brings families together—whether baking cookies with toddlers or bannock with parents and grandparents.
  • Resilience + Comfort: Triple-pane windows, thoughtful shading, and child-scaled design details ensure a safe, joyful environment.

Learn More About Mount Dennis

We’ve shared insights on the Mount Dennis project in previous blog posts as well as the project page:

Free Climate + Sustainability Tools for Architects and Designers: Canadian Architect

We’re pleased to share that Coolearth was referenced in the latest issue of Canadian Architect – October 2025 in a feature on free and pay-what-you-can climate software resources.

The article highlights a range of powerful tools available to building professionals—from embodied carbon calculators to climate data portals and benchmarking platforms. These free or pay-what-you-can resources help architects, engineers, and clients make informed design decisions that respond to today’s climate realities and anticipate tomorrow’s conditions.

Coolearth has used many of these tools for many years and they are very valuable for guiding sustainable design. PVWatts is a great tool for calculating solar energy generation potential when designing for Net-Zero energy.

Sheena has been working with the OBJECTIVE team to develop their software which is an open-sourced,
Excel-based tool for building code review, carbon targeting and thermal energy use intensity (TEUI) measurement.

Some of the other featured tools include:

  • ClimateData.ca – national future climate projections, maps, and design values
  • Compass – Ontario’s energy benchmarking tool for new construction
  • Ladybug Tools – open-source environmental analysis plug-ins
  • Objective – an open-sourced tool (with Coolearth and OpenBuilding contributions) that supports code review, carbon targeting, and energy use intensity tracking

You can read the full story here: Free Climate Software Resources
And a closely related piece here: Why Future Climate Data Matters for Building Design Today

For those interested, the full digital issue is also online: Canadian Architect – October 2025

We’re proud to see our work included in this national conversation about free, accessible tools for sustainable design, and look forward to using the tools we’ve just learned about from the article!!

Peterborough Straw Bale Passive House – Construction Update

The clients for this project, a young family, wanted a home that is healthy, energy efficient, and closely connected to nature. They were drawn to simple proportions inspired by the rural vernacular, and to materials that are natural, low-toxicity, and durable. The design reflects these priorities with straw bale insulation, wood fibre, mineral wool, lime plaster, and stained wood siding, creating a home that is both modern in performance and grounded in timeless building traditions.

Work is progressing steadily on the Douro Fourth Line straw bale Passive House just outside of Peterborough. The structure is now fully framed and several key details of the building system are visible on site.

Passive House Principles and Straw Bale Benefits

The building systems are all-electric and designed for very low energy demand. Heating and cooling are provided by an air-source heat pump furnace. A high-performance ERV is paired with a supply-side ground loop for summer cooling and winter efficiency. The ERV ensures continuous fresh air supply and filtration. Equipped with a MERV-13 filter, it also protects the interior from smoke and outdoor air pollutants, an important feature as summer wildfire events become more frequent. Domestic hot water will be supplied by a heat pump water heater. There is no fireplace — reducing both cost and complexity while reinforcing the airtight, all-electric strategy.

This home is designed to the international Passive House standard, modeled in PHPP v10 with an estimated Energy Use Intensity (EUI) of 30 kWh/m²a (metric). Passive House focuses on five main strategies: very high levels of insulation, airtight construction, minimized thermal bridging, high-performance windows and doors, and balanced ventilation with heat recovery. Together these dramatically reduce heating and cooling demand, making it possible to achieve comfort with very small mechanical systems.

A common challenge in highly insulated buildings is summertime overheating. Windows are supplied by Vetta with triple glazing and Passive House certification, and operable exterior wood shutters will provide essential shading. Exterior shading can keep nearly 90% of solar heat outside before it reaches the glass, preventing overheating during hot weeks when mechanical systems alone can struggle to keep up. This is a core Passive House principle: controlling the thermal envelope first, rather than relying on active cooling.

Straw bale construction adds a further advantage. Unlike lightweight insulation materials, straw has significant thermal mass and unique hygrothermal properties. The thick walls slow down how quickly temperatures shift — a phenomenon known as thermal lag. This means the building is not only well-insulated but also less prone to rapid swings in temperature. On hot days, the straw walls absorb and delay heat flow, smoothing out peak loads and making the indoor environment more stable and comfortable. Combined with Passive House detailing, this results in a building that is both extremely efficient and naturally resilient.

The roof is built with open web wood trusses that arrive on-site in four pieces. Uniquely, open web wood trusses act as ‘gusset plates’ and provide the structural connection, which means no ridge beam or collar ties are required — this create a beautiful open flex-space in the attic. The open webs also make it straightforward to route services without cutting through framing, and the 22″ depth will allow for an R-value over 70.

The walls are a double stud system, designed for dense straw bale insulation. Plywood gusset plates tie the inner and outer walls together. Between studs, wood fibre insulation fills the voids where the strawbales are not inserted. On the exterior, a continuous 2″ layer of mineral wool wraps the building, and the final cladding will be stained wood siding. This combination provides a very robust thermal envelope with continuous insulation and minimized thermal bridging.

Temporary plastic is currently protecting the building while the straw bale installation proceeds. Once complete, the bales will be plastered to form part of the airtight layer and interior finish. In addition to durability, plaster walls are breathable, helping regulate humidity naturally. They also absorb and release moisture, buffering interior conditions and reducing pollutants in the indoor air.

In addition to performance, the project emphasizes healthy materials. The palette is deliberately simple: straw for insulation, lime plaster and paint for finishes, solid wood for structure and cladding. There is no OSB, MDF, or other products containing formaldehyde or synthetic resins. These choices reduce indoor air pollutants, simplify recycling at end of life, and reflect the project’s commitment to a truly natural building.

The floor system is constructed with 14″ deep open web wood trusses. Unlike conventional joists, these trusses use a diagonal web pattern to create strong, rigid members that span long distances. This allows for an open floor plate without interior columns or bearing walls, giving the family flexibility in how rooms are laid out. Open web trusses also have a major advantage for mechanical systems: ducts, pipes, and wiring can pass easily through the web openings. This avoids drilling holes or notching joists, speeding up installation and reducing structural compromises. The trusses are fabricated entirely from solid wood with plywood gussets, without the glues or adhesives common in engineered products. The result is both durable and straightforward, aligning with the project’s preference for natural and low-toxicity materials.

While there are many straw bale homes in Ontario, this project will be one of the few designed to meet Passive House low energy building performance levels while also combining natural materials. The use of materials will create healthy interiors with low pollutants, while the design supports comfort through insulation, shading, ventilation, and thermal mass. The house will also connect to its landscape, with space for gardening and permaculture, and its simple proportions and minimal detailing will reflect a quiet, nature-based way of living that also evokes the surrounding traditional architectures.

At Coolearth, our interest is in showing how projects like this can bring together performance, ecology, and health in ways that are practical and replicable.

The builder is Straworks — special thanks to Deirdre, Sol, Myles, Mike for the great work!

Next steps are adding the straw bales into the stud spacing, installing the windows, and roofing and getting ready for the interior phase of the project.